Replies 14
This is your link.
The first link navigates, but to a text-based page as I see. But it does work on my end.
One of your other links here. (That's a site error for some reason.)
Seems to work for me. You should use Firefox as Javascript layering works better on Firefox than it does on Chrome. In which case I blame Chrome more than I do UE.
Second link test.
The first link navigates, but to a text-based page as I see. But it does work on my end.
One of your other links here. (That's a site error for some reason.)
Seems to work for me. You should use Firefox as Javascript layering works better on Firefox than it does on Chrome. In which case I blame Chrome more than I do UE.
Second link test.
This is your link.
The first link navigates, but to a text-based page as I see. But it does work on my end.
One of your other links here. (That's a site error for some reason.)
Seems to work for me. You should use Firefox as Javascript layering works better on Firefox than it does on Chrome. In which case I blame Chrome more than I do UE.
Second link test.
Hi Mike, The first link navigates, but to a text-based page as I see. But it does work on my end.
One of your other links here. (That's a site error for some reason.)
Seems to work for me. You should use Firefox as Javascript layering works better on Firefox than it does on Chrome. In which case I blame Chrome more than I do UE.
Second link test.
You misunderstood.
Here's the link I'm trying to post (this is an image):
This is one link, not two.
If I try to post it, this is what I get:
http://web.archive.org/web/20120614064636/http://r...
P.S. I'm using Firefox.
Re: Proper link.
Hi Mike,
You misunderstood.
Here's the link I'm trying to post (this is an image):
![]()
This is one link, not two.
If I try to post it, this is what I get:
http://web.archive.org/web/20120614064636/http://r...
P.S. I'm using Firefox.
Hey RaMMicHaeL,You misunderstood.
Here's the link I'm trying to post (this is an image):
This is one link, not two.
If I try to post it, this is what I get:
http://web.archive.org/web/20120614064636/http://r...
P.S. I'm using Firefox.
Sorry about that. I've never seen one URL with two "https" but you're right, it doesn't work. Although the link itself navigates and I see the site come up correctly, it doesn't embed in the given text. I've replicated this issue -- weird.
This is your link.
The first link navigates, but to a text-based page as I see. But it does work on my end.
One of your other links here. (That's a site error for some reason.)
Seems to work for me. You should use Firefox as Javascript layering works better on Firefox than it does on Chrome. In which case I blame Chrome more than I do UE.
Second link test.
>
Hey RaMMicHaeL,The first link navigates, but to a text-based page as I see. But it does work on my end.
One of your other links here. (That's a site error for some reason.)
Seems to work for me. You should use Firefox as Javascript layering works better on Firefox than it does on Chrome. In which case I blame Chrome more than I do UE.
Second link test.
>
> Sorry about that. Why is there two "https" in one URL? That doesn't look valid, but I typed it out and got this. Can I see a screenshot? I've not seen a url with two https really, but I could be in the wrong here.
I don't know, that's how the Wayback Machine works.
http://archive.org/web/
>
Hey RaMMicHaeL,
>
> Sorry about that. Why is there two "https" in one URL? That doesn't look valid, but I typed it out and got this. Can I see a screenshot? I've not seen a url with two https really, but I could be in the wrong here.
I don't know, that's how the Wayback Machine works.
http://archive.org/web/
Ah, okay. Seems possible, though. It may be that UserEcho hasn't implemented support for this kind of link, which I hope they do soon for users who need such URLs. >
> Sorry about that. Why is there two "https" in one URL? That doesn't look valid, but I typed it out and got this. Can I see a screenshot? I've not seen a url with two https really, but I could be in the wrong here.
I don't know, that's how the Wayback Machine works.
http://archive.org/web/
Ah, okay. Seems possible, though. It may be that UserEcho hasn't implemented support for this kind of link, which I hope they do soon for users who need such URLs.
The reply box of UserEcho is buggy is general. I can think of at least five bug reports from the top of my head, but I don't feel like it's worth reporting them, as the UserEcho team is not very responsive.This one, though, even has no workarounds - there's just no way to paste this link - not in code tags, not via the HTML editor. It just ends up being screwed.
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=MD0kdWa5